Clinical Trial: Patient Satisfaction and Peri-Implant Tissue Success of Hybrid Ceramic Versus E-Max Superstructures

Study Status: Not yet recruiting
Recruit Status: Not yet recruiting
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: Esthetic Patient Satisfaction and Peri-Implant Tissue Success of Crystal Ultra Hybrid Ceramic Compared to E-Max Superstructures in Esthetic Zone

Brief Summary: In patients receiving implants in the esthetic zone, would the use of new Nano hybrid ceramic crown material (Crystal Ultra) improve esthetic patient satisfaction and peri-implant tissue success when compared with Lithium Disilicate crown (E-max)?

Detailed Summary:

The patient will be treated in visits designated as follows:

Visit 1: Preoperative records, face-to-face adherence reminder session, signing consents, clinical, radiographic examination and primary impression for diagnostic cast construction.

Visit 2: (first stage surgery): implant placement surgical procedure and postoperative radiograph.

Visit 3: After 3months (second stage surgery): re-opening of surgical site, placement of healing abutments and temporary crowns.

Visit 4: After 2 weeks, removing of temporary restorations and taking of final impressions Visit 5: placement of different ceramic crown superstructures and recording different outcome values.


Sponsor: Cairo University

Current Primary Outcome: Esthetic Patient satisfaction [ Time Frame: 1 year ]

Measurement unit is Binary


Original Primary Outcome: Same as current

Current Secondary Outcome: Peri-implant tissue success (A-Marginal Bone Loss, B-Relative attachment level, C-Peri-Implant Probing depth, D-Sulcus bleeding) [ Time Frame: 1 year ]

Measurement unit is Categorical


Original Secondary Outcome: Same as current

Information By: Cairo University

Dates:
Date Received: October 18, 2016
Date Started: December 2016
Date Completion: May 2018
Last Updated: October 19, 2016
Last Verified: October 2016