Clinical Trial: Study Comparing Marathon Polyethylene and Enduron Polyethylene Acetabular Liners Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Study Status: Completed
Recruit Status: Completed
Study Type: Interventional
Official Title: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Marathon Polyethylene and Enduron Polyethylene Acetabular Liners Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to determine whether crosslinked Marathon and standard Enduron polyethylene liners show differences in bone loss around the hip implant.
Detailed Summary: Several institutions report very low wear rates with highly crosslinked polyethylene based on early clinical data. However, since bone loss typically appears after 5-year follow-up, the reduction in the incidence and extent of bone loss among total hip replacement patients with crosslinked Marathon liners, compared to those with standard Enduron liners, has not been as dramatic as the wear reduction. Despite the substantial reduction in wear that we observed at 5-year follow-up, the patients' perceptions of their outcomes remained similar among the Marathon and Enduron groups. This study will evaluate outcome at a minimum of 10-years after surgery among the same group of patients whose outcome was previously reported at 5-year follow-up. At 10-year follow-up, we anticipate that the reduction in wear associated with Marathon polyethylene will be associated with significant reductions in bone loss when compared to the Enduron polyethylene.
Sponsor: Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Current Primary Outcome: Incidence of Clinically Significant Osteolysis [ Time Frame: Minimum 9-year radiographic follow-up ]
Original Primary Outcome: Incidence of Clinically Significant Osteolysis [ Time Frame: 10 year follow-up ]
Current Secondary Outcome:
- Polyethylene Wear [ Time Frame: Minimum 9-year radiographic follow-up ]A single reviewer, who was blinded to the type of polyethylene liner, evaluated femoral head penetration among all unrevised hips with minimum 9-year radiographic follow-up using serial anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. Two-dimensional head penetration was determined for each follow-up radiograph relative to the immediate post-operative (nominal 6-week follow-up) reference view using Hip Suite Analysis version 8.0 with elliptical correction, a validated, computer-assisted technique. A linear wear rate was evaluated for each hip that had a minimum of three follow-up radiographs by using a least-squares linear regression to calculate the slope of the best-fit line for the wear vector magnitude versus time in situ data. The slope from this regression represented the steady-state linear wear rate. The steady-state linear wear rate data from all hips in a group was used to compute a mean polyethylene wear value.
- Rate of Reoperation [ Time Frame: 10-year follow-up ]The rate of reoperation was based on the number of reoperations in each group. Any additional surgery after a participant's initial hip replacement was considered a reoperation.
- Harris Hip Score [ Time Frame: Minimum 9-year follow-up ]The Harris Hip Score measures outcome after hip replacement and is based on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
- Patient Satisfaction [ Time Frame: Minimum 9-year follow-up ]Patient satisfaction was quantified by asking participants to respond "yes" or "no" to the question, "Are you satisfied with the results of your hip operation?"
Original Secondary Outcome:
- Polyethylene Wear [ Time Frame: 10-year follow-up ]
- Rate of Reoperation [ Time Frame: 10-year follow-up ]
- Patient Satisfaction [ Time Frame: 10-year follow-up ]
- Harris Hip Score [ Time Frame: 10-year follow-up ]
- Bone loss as measured by x-rays and CT scan [ Time Frame: 10-year follow-up ]
Information By: Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Dates:
Date Received: May 10, 2010
Date Started: December 1998
Date Completion:
Last Updated: November 3, 2014
Last Verified: November 2014