Clinical Trial: Acupressure and Relaxation for Nausea Control

Study Status: Completed
Recruit Status: Completed
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: Acupressure and Relaxation for Nausea Control

Brief Summary:

This study hypothesizes that patients receiving efficacy enhancing information about the acupressure bands will expect less treatment-related nausea, which will subsequently result in less treatment-related nausea compared to patients who do not receive such information.

This study extends prior research by utilizing a randomized controlled trial in a clinical environment to examine the efficacy of an intervention that is specifically designed to reduce patients' response expectancies concerning nausea development from cancer treatments, and, thereby, reduce nausea.

The objectives of this study are as follow:

  1. To provide preliminary data on whether a two-tiered strategy to increase patients' expectancies for nausea prevention and/or management will result in reduced chemotherapy-induced nausea.
  2. To provide preliminary data on whether a two-tiered strategy to increase patients' expectancies for nausea prevention and/or management will result in increased health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.

To provide preliminary data on whether a two-tiered strategy to increase patients' expectancies for nausea prevention and/or management is more effective than a single-tiered strategy in reducing chemotherapy- induced nausea.


Detailed Summary:

This study hypothesizes that patients receiving efficacy enhancing information about the acupressure bands will expect less treatment-related nausea, which will subsequently result in less treatment-related nausea compared to patients who do not receive such information.

This study extends prior research by utilizing a randomized controlled trial in a clinical environment to examine the efficacy of an intervention that is specifically designed to reduce patients' response expectancies concerning nausea development from cancer treatments, and, thereby, reduce nausea.

The objectives of this study are as follow:

  1. To provide preliminary data on whether a two-tiered strategy to increase patients' expectancies for nausea prevention and/or management will result in reduced chemotherapy-induced nausea.
  2. To provide preliminary data on whether a two-tiered strategy to increase patients' expectancies for nausea prevention and/or management will result in increased health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.

To provide preliminary data on whether a two-tiered strategy to increase patients' expectancies for nausea prevention and/or management is more effective than a single-tiered strategy in reducing chemotherapy- induced nausea.

The study contains the following arms:

  1. Control handout and control tape.
  2. Active handout and control tape.
  3. Control handout and active tape.
  4. Active handout and active t
    Sponsor: University of Rochester

    Current Primary Outcome: Five-day Nausea Diary [ Time Frame: Five days ]

    Nausea was measured using a five-day patient report diary. Each day was divided into 4 sections: morning, afternoon, evening, and night. Patients reported severity of nausea for each period daily. Severity of nausea was assessed on a 7-point rating scale, anchored at one end by 1 = "Not at all nauseated" and at the other end by 7 = "Extremely nauseated." The description "Moderately nauseated" was centered on the scale below the 4. Average Nausea was the mean severity for the 20 reporting periods.


    Original Primary Outcome: 1- Mean Nausea severity

    Current Secondary Outcome: Health Related Quality of Life [ Time Frame: 5 days ]

    Health-Related Quality of Life was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale - General (FACT-G). The FACT-G is a 28-item scale developed specifically for use in cancer clinical trials. Possible scores range from a low of 0 to a high of 112. Along with a total score representing HRQL, there are psychometrically validated subscales of physical, functional, social, and cognitive-emotional status. It has become one of the most commonly used measures in oncology, and we have used this scale in our previous studies.


    Original Secondary Outcome: 2- Health Related Quality of Life

    Information By: University of Rochester

    Dates:
    Date Received: October 19, 2005
    Date Started: November 2005
    Date Completion:
    Last Updated: May 21, 2015
    Last Verified: March 2010