Clinical Trial: ASIS for Botox in Upper Limb Spasticity

Study Status: Not yet recruiting
Recruit Status: Not yet recruiting
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: ASIS for Botox in Upper Limb Spasticity

Brief Summary: Botox act on nerve endings, yet there are no nerve endings inside the muscle, where they are typically injected. All nerves terminate on the fascia, where ASIS device can precisely deliver Botox by creating that subdermal bloodless space, between the skin and muscle. Thus enhancing and prolonging Botox's efficacy, at the same time prevent it's unnecessary adverse reactions and distant spread, especially since Botox has no reason to travel to the rest of the body any way.

Detailed Summary:

Aim 1 over 6 months will demonstrate ASIS device's consistent performance on 60 adult subjects with Upper limb Spasticity. Gadolinium will be injected with ASIS subdermally (30) or conventional intramuscularly (30) for these 7 muscle groups: Biceps Brachii, Flexor Carpi Radialis, Flexor Carpi Ulnaris, Flexor Digitorum Profundus, Flexor Digitorum Sublimis, Adductor Pollicis, and Flexor Pollicis Longus. An MRI will be taken promptly after Gadolinium injection, as starting reference, to which subsequent MRI taken at 6 hrs, 12 hrs, and 24 hrs later will be compared for Persistent %. Since there isn't a way to measure level of Gadolinium within it, or any other (e.g. Botox) for that matter, at least the Prolongation of Gadolinium may be approximated by the greater or longer Persistent % on MRI. However, this approximation can only work if the variables are minimized to the same population with Upper limb Spasticity, and these particular 7 muscle groups. Case in point, patients with Upper limb Spasticity presumably have hyperactivity in these 7 muscle groups, so expectantly will have shortened Gadolinium intramuscularly Persistent %, and somewhat reduced Gadolinium subdermally Persistent % as well due to agitation, thus these Persistent % values in Upper limb Spasticity patients will not be like those of normal patients, or even the same between these 7 different muscle groups. Therefore, the Relative Prolongation Ability Score or total Persistent % subdermally over total Persistent % intramuscularly, will be specific and valuable indicators to help us modify the Botox dosage and duration to inject into that "unknown" subdermal bloodless space for Aim 2.

Aim 2 over 12 months, using Botox, instead of Gadolinium, to demonstrate the advantages of ASIS device subdermally over intramuscularly, for the same 60 adult subjects with Upper limb Spasticity, on these particular 7
Sponsor: li nguyen

Current Primary Outcome: Relative Prolongation Ability Score for Gadolinium subdermally injected. [ Time Frame: 6 months ]

Gadolinium will be injected with ASIS subdermally (30) or intramuscularly (30) in Upper Limb Spasticity adult patients for these 7 muscle groups: Biceps Brachii, Flexor Carpi Radialis, Flexor Carpi Ulnaris, Flexor Digitorum Profundus, Flexor Digitorum Sublimis, Adductor Pollicis, and Flexor Pollicis Longus. MRI will be taken promptly after, as starting reference, to which subsequent MRI at 6 hrs, 12 hrs, and 24 hrs later will be compared for Persistent %. This approximation can only work if the variables are minimized to the same population with Upper Limb Spasticity, and these particular 7 muscle groups. The Relative Prolongation Ability Score or total Persistent % subdermally over total Persistent % intramuscularly, in Upper Limb Spasticity patients will not be same as normal patients, or even between these 7 different muscle groups, but valuable indicators to help us modify Botox dosage and duration to inject into "unknown" subdermal bloodless space for Aim 2.


Original Primary Outcome: Same as current

Current Secondary Outcome: Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly vs. subdermally in Upper Limb Spasticity. [ Time Frame: 12 months ]

Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly vs. subdermally with ASIS Device at Week 6,12,18, 24, and 30; in terms of improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale (-4=very marked worsening to +4=very marked improvement). Also in terms of improvement, or Median Change from Baseline in Flexor Tone on Ashworth Scale, for Elbow, Wrist, Finger, and Thumb. Ashworth score (the force required to move an extremity around a joint):

0 = No increase in muscle tone (none)

  1. = Slight increase in muscle tone, giving a 'catch' when the limb was flexed or extended (mild)
  2. = More marked increase in muscle tone but affected limb is easily flexed (moderate)
  3. = Considerable increase in muscle tone - passive movement difficult (severe)
  4. = Limb rigid in flexion or extension (very severe).


Original Secondary Outcome: Same as current

Information By: ASIS Corporation

Dates:
Date Received: February 26, 2014
Date Started: January 2016
Date Completion: June 2017
Last Updated: June 22, 2015
Last Verified: June 2015