Clinical Trial: OPtimal Timing of Thromboprophylaxis in Traumatic IntraCranial Haemorrhage - Pilot Study

Study Status: Recruiting
Recruit Status: Unknown status
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: OPTTICH Pilot Study - OPtimal Timing of Thromboprophylaxis in Traumatic IntraCranial Haemorrhage

Brief Summary: Victims of trauma with severe head injury who have bled into their brains are at high risk of developing blood clots in their legs. These blood clots can break off and travel through the bloodstream to the lungs, resulting in death. Blood thinners can be given to patients to prevent blood clots from developing but this can leave patients at risk for additional bleeding in the brain, causing further damage or death. The earlier blood thinners are started, the more effective they are at preventing blood clots. In addition, some patients with severe head injury who have bled into their brains will develop further bleeding even if they do not receive blood thinners. Even though a growing body of research has shown that the majority of bleeding in the brain stops within the first 24 hours after injury and that it is safe to start blood thinners as early as 24 hours after injury, doctors are still waiting longer than 4 days to start blood thinners in these patients over concerns of worsening bleeding. In Canada, almost half of the patients with severe head injury do not receive blood thinners until at least five days after injury. Delays in starting blood thinners appear to put patients at increased risk of developing blood clots, unnecessarily. This study will compare the benefits of starting low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), a type of blood thinner, early (36 to 48 hours after injury) versus the current practice (waiting until the 6th day after being injured) in preventing blood clots in patients who have bled into their brains after severe head injury. The investigators believe that starting LMWH earlier will be more effective in preventing blood clots without worsening any bleeding when compared to waiting to start blood thinners. This study is called OPTTICH (OPtimal timing of Thromboprophylaxis in Traumatic IntraCranial Haemorrhage) and will be the largest Canadian investigator-initiated randomized control trial on blood clot prevention in trauma patients with se

Detailed Summary:
Sponsor: McMaster University

Current Primary Outcome: Proximal lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by bilateral lower extremity compression ultrasound (US). [ Time Frame: Maximum of 60 days or until hospital discharge. ]

Ultrasounds will be performed within 72 hours of enrollment as well as twice weekly when in ICU and weekly thereafter. Non-compressibility of 1 or more proximal deep venous segments on compression US will be considered diagnostic. Each segment will be assessed as fully compressible, partially compressible, not compressible, or not well-visualized. All positive US will be recorded and stratified into above-knee (proximal DVT) or below-knee (distal DVT). Patients who have both proximal and distal DVT will be classified as having proximal DVT.


Original Primary Outcome: Same as current

Current Secondary Outcome:

  • Non-intracranial bleeding [ Time Frame: Maximum of 60 days or until hospital discharge. ]
    Non-intracranial bleeding events will be recorded and classified as either major or minor bleeding, according to a modified bleeding assessment tool adapted to our patient population.
  • Pulmonary Embolism (PE) [ Time Frame: Maximum of 60 days or until hospital discharge. ]
    Patients who develop clinical suspicion of PE will have a helical CT chest. Pulmonary embolism will be diagnosed by the presence of an intraluminal filling defect detected in either the main, lobar or segmental branches or the pulmonary artery. Patients with a high probability of PE on clinical grounds but with negative CT chest will undergo a ventilation-perfusion scan.
  • Intracranial haemorrhage progression (IHP) [ Time Frame: Maximum of 60 days or until hospital discharge. ]
    If a patient develops clinical evidence of neurological deterioration, an emergent head CT scan will be performed. The CT scan will be reviewed by the blinded attending neuroradiologist. A comparison to the previous CT scan will be made and assessed for evidence of IHP. Intracranial haemorrhage progression will be defined as either 1) the development of a new haematoma, 2) any enlargement of an existing haematoma by an attending neuroradiologist's CT report, or 3) any progression of haematoma by the Marshall Head CT Classification System.


Original Secondary Outcome: Same as current

Information By: McMaster University

Dates:
Date Received: October 6, 2014
Date Started: October 2014
Date Completion: September 2016
Last Updated: April 8, 2015
Last Verified: April 2015