Clinical Trial: Test of a Web-based Intervention to Promote Hearing Protector Use

Study Status: Completed
Recruit Status: Completed
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: Test of a Web-based Intervention to Promote Hearing Protector Use

Brief Summary: The purpose of this project is to compare the effectiveness of several approaches to influencing hearing protector use. The goals of this study are to further develop an intervention to promote farmers' use of hearing protectors, and compare the effectiveness of the developed intervention with two alternative approaches to influencing hearing protector use behavior, delivered in various combinations. This study will determine if significant change in hearing protection use can be achieved in a one-shot web-based or protector-supply intervention. Results will determine the need for future program modifications, e.g., inclusion of booster(s).

Detailed Summary:

OBJECTIVE: To further develop and test an intervention to promote farmers' use of hearing protection devices (HPDs).

SPECIFIC AIMS: The specific aim of this study is to contrast the effects of three alternative NIHL-prevention intervention strategies, delivered in various combinations on HPD use and use-related attitudes/beliefs. Specifically, the three approaches include: a) an interactive, predictors-based intervention delivered via the Internet ("Interactive Web," IWI); b) a static informational Web site designed to increase farmers' use of HPDs ("Static Web," SWI); and c) sampler of HPDs, e.g., ear muffs, plugs ("HPD Intervention," HPD I).

HYPOTHESIS 1: Participants receiving interactive Web interventions (IWI) will have higher hearing protector device (HPD) use and more favorable use-related attitudes/beliefs than participants not receiving interactive web interventions (IWI); HYPOTHESIS 2: Participants receiving the HPD intervention (HPDI)will have higher HPD use and more positive use-related attitudes/beliefs than participants not receiving the HPD intervention (HPDI). HYPOTHESIS 3: Participants visiting the Web site more frequently will have higher HPD use than those visiting less frequently. HYPOTHESIS 4. There will be no interaction between intervention delivery mode (interactive vs. static) and HPDI.

BACKGROUND: Farmers are among the most noise-exposed group of workers, and experience rates of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) of up to 72% compared to workers in other industries (x%). NIHL is associated with negative impact on quality of life, including difficulty in communication, risk of not hearing warning sounds, and tinnitus. Although use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) would protect them from NIHL, use among farmers is low
Sponsor: Marjorie McCullagh

Current Primary Outcome: Hearing protector device (HPD) use [ Time Frame: 12 months ]

Original Primary Outcome: Same as current

Current Secondary Outcome: hearing protector use-related attitudes/beliefs [ Time Frame: 12 months ]

Original Secondary Outcome: Same as current

Information By: University of Michigan

Dates:
Date Received: October 14, 2011
Date Started: November 2011
Date Completion:
Last Updated: October 1, 2015
Last Verified: October 2015