Clinical Trial: Salvage Chemotherapy for Poor Prognosis Germ Cell Tumors

Study Status: Recruiting
Recruit Status: Recruiting
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: Salvage Chemotherapy for Poor Prognosis Germ Cell Tumors - A Phase I-II Sequential Chemotherapy Protocol of Bevacizumab (Avastin) Plus High-dose ICE (Ifosfamide - Carbopla

Brief Summary:

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is a standard salvage treatment used in adults with germ cell tumors (Einhorn et al, J Clin Oncol 2007).

Disease prognosis following 1 to 2 intensified combinations of etoposide - carboplatin +/- ifosfamide depends on the patient's performance status (PS) at inclusion and the prior sensitivity of the disease to cisplatin. A poor PS and/or being refractory to cisplatin suggest a higher toxicity and a bad prognosis.

However, predictive factors of response to high-dose chemotherapy do not include a chemo-sensitivity phase with a semi-intensive chemotherapy excluding a platinum compound (epirubicin - paclitaxel), which still allows stem-cell harvest. The use of this chemotherapy combination induced a response in more than one third of the patients treated during disease progression in the TAXIF I study. The same strategy was tested in the TAXIF II study, which completed the inclusion of 45 patients and was closed in May 2008. Results of the TAXIF II study, are currently being analyzed; they support the hypothesis to prioritarily treat patients with a sensitive relapsed disease at the time of the high-dose administration.

A combination of a semi-intensive sequential ICE type chemotherapy plus bevacizumab was used on a highly refractory patient. A 5 months nearly complete response was achieved. Indeed, the overexpression of VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) has been identified as an independent risk factor in patients with germ cell tumor. Therefore, a treatment strategy using an inductive chemotherapy followed, in case of response, by a double intensification therapy in combination with a VEGF treatment, could be an interesting approach in patients with poor prognosis germ cell tumors.

Detailed Summary:
Sponsor: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Current Primary Outcome:

  • Response [ Time Frame: 3 months ]
    Partial response or complete response evaluated by scanography and assay for tumor marker(s) a month after the end of the 2 cycles
  • Toxicity [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Safety recorded according to CTCAE-v4 criteria


Original Primary Outcome: Same as current

Current Secondary Outcome:

  • complete response rate [ Time Frame: within 2 years of inclusion ]
  • complete pathological response (pCR) or complete surgical response (sCR) [ Time Frame: within 2 years after inclusion ]
  • overall survival [ Time Frame: within 2 years after inclusion ]
  • response duration [ Time Frame: within 2 years after inclusion ]
  • progression-free survival [ Time Frame: within 2 years after inclusion ]


Original Secondary Outcome: Same as current

Information By: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Dates:
Date Received: October 11, 2013
Date Started: April 2012
Date Completion: September 2017
Last Updated: June 23, 2016
Last Verified: June 2016