Clinical Trial: DMEK Versus DSAEK Study

Study Status: Not yet recruiting
Recruit Status: Not yet recruiting
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: Corneal Transplantation by DMEK - is it Really Better Than DSAEK?

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to determine whether corneal transplantation by Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty more favourable and cost-effective is compared to Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelium Corneal Dystrophy.

Detailed Summary:

FECD is a progressive, multifactorial and irreversible disease characterized by accelerated loss of corneal endothelial cells in the innermost layer of the cornea that leads to vision impairment and potential blindness if left untreated. FECD is responsible for more than 50% of the 1.300 annual corneal transplantations in the Netherlands.

Corneal transplantation improves vision and quality of life in patients with corneal disease. Currently, the standard of care for patients with Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) is Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK), in which only the posterior layers of the cornea are transplanted. However, visual recovery following DSAEK is suboptimal. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK), the latest technique in corneal transplantation involves transplantation of only a monolayer of corneal endothelium and Descemet's membrane providing the thinnest endothelial graft possible. DMEK has been suggested to result in faster and better visual recovery compared to DSAEK. While the economic burden, both medical and social, from this disease has not been assessed to date, costs associated with corneal transplantation reach $ 110 million dollars yearly for the 47.000 transplantations in the USA.

The objective of this project is to assess the effects and costs of DMEK vs. DSAEK in order to determine whether the new technique is effective and cost-effective over the standard technique.

The primary outcome measure is best-corrected visual acuity. Secondary outcome measures are contrast acuity, astigmatism, quality of vision, endothelial cell loss, incidence of graft rejection, primary graft failure, cornea donor loss due to preparation, and generic and vision-related quality of life.


Sponsor: Maastricht University Medical Center

Current Primary Outcome: Change in best-corrected visual acuity [ Time Frame: Preoperatively and 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively ]

Visual acuity will be measured by ETDRS letter charts


Original Primary Outcome: Same as current

Current Secondary Outcome:

  • Change in contrast sensitivity [ Time Frame: Preoperatively and 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively ]
    Contrast sensitivity will be measured using the CSV-1000 chart by Vector Vision
  • Change in astigmatism [ Time Frame: Preoperatively and 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively ]
    Astigmatism will be measured using the The Pentacam HR (Oculus Inc., Lynnwood, USA)
  • Change in corneal scatter [ Time Frame: Preoperatively and 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively ]
    Corneal scatter will be measured using a confocal microscope
  • Change in endothelial cell loss [ Time Frame: Preoperatively and 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively ]
    Endothelial cell loss will be measured using specular microscopy photography.
  • Incidence of graft rejection [ Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively ]
  • Incidence of primary graft failure [ Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively ]
    Primary Graft failure will be assessed during ophthalmic examination.
  • Incidence of cornea donor loss due to preparation [ Time Frame: Preoperatively ]
    The eye bank providing the donor cornea's will register cornea donor loss if a complication occurs during preparation that renders the cornea unusable.
  • Change in generic quality of life [ Time Frame: Preoperatively and 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively ]
    Generic quality of life will be measured using the HUI3 (Health Utility Index Mark 3), which test 8 dimensions: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition and pain.
  • Change in generic quality of life [ Time Frame: Preoperatively and 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively ]
    Generic quality of life will be measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, which tests 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
  • Change in vision-related quality of life [ Time Frame: Preoperatively and 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively ]
    Vision-related quality of life will be measured using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), which is specified for vision-related quality of life.


Original Secondary Outcome: Same as current

Information By: Maastricht University Medical Center

Dates:
Date Received: May 20, 2016
Date Started: June 2016
Date Completion: April 2018
Last Updated: June 2, 2016
Last Verified: January 2016