Clinical Trial: Comparison of Interventions for Developmental Dyslexia

Study Status: Recruiting
Recruit Status: Recruiting
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: The Effectiveness of Intervention for Developmental Dyslexia: The Rhythmic Reading Training Compared With Hemisphere-Specific Stimulation and Action Video Games

Brief Summary: The purpose of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of Rhythmic Reading Training (RRT), a computer-assisted intervention method that combines sublexical reading exercises with rhythm processing, and that of an intervention resulting from the combination of two yet validated treatments for DD, namely, Bakker's Visual Hemisphere-Specific Stimulation (VHSS) and the Action Video Game Training (AVG). Finally, the effectiveness of the administration of only AVG is intended to be compared to other treatments. All interventions are administered for 13 hours over 9 days to a group of Italian students with DD aged 8-12.

Detailed Summary:
Sponsor: Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Current Primary Outcome:

  • Text reading [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
    The ability to read aloud a text was assessed using the Italian standardized test 'New MT reading tests for junior high school' (Nuove prove di lettura MT per la scuola media inferiore), which provides accuracy and speed scores in reading aloud age-normed texts.
  • Word reading [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
    The ability to read aloud lists of words was assessed using the following Italian standardized tests: 'Assessment battery for Developmental Dyslexia and Dysorthography-2' (Batteria per la valutazione della dislessia e disortografia evolutiva - DDE-2), in which speed and accuracy scores were computed for word reading (4 lists of 28 words each with different lengths and frequency of use); 'Word and pseudo-word reading test' (WPRT, Prova di lettura di parole e non parole), in which speed and accuracy scores were computed for word reading (4 lists of 30 words varying according to length: short vs. long and frequency of use: low vs. high frequency).
  • Pseudo-word reading [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
    The ability to read aloud lists of pseudo-words was assessed using the following Italian standardized tests: 'Assessment battery for Developmental Dyslexia and Dysorthography-2' (Batteria per la valutazione della dislessia e disortografia evolutiva - DDE-2), in which speed and accuracy scores were computed for pseudo-word reading (2 lists of 16 pseudo-words each with different lengths); 'Word and pseudo-word reading test' (WPRT, Prova di lettura di parole e non parole), in which speed and accuracy scores were computed for pseudo-words reading (2 lists of 30 pseudo

    Original Primary Outcome: Same as current

    Current Secondary Outcome:

    • Lexical access [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
      Rapid automatized naming ability was assessed using the 'Rapid Automatized Naming test (RAN) - Colours' test (Test di denominazione rapida - Colori); in this test, matrices of 5 different colours were presented. The colours were presented in small 1 by 1 cm squares; they were black, blue (RGB 51-102-255), red (RGB 221-8-6), yellow (RGB 252-243-5), or green (RGB 31-183-20). There were 10 rows of 5 stimuli in each matrix for a total of 50 stimuli. Two different matrices for each condition were provided. In the RAN test, the child was requested to name each stimulus in the matrix as quickly and as accurately as possible. The dependent measure was the mean time in seconds/syllable. Naming errors were also recorded.
    • Phonological awareness: phonemic blending [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
      Phoneme Blending assesses the capacity to derive a phonemic pattern from distinct phonemic units. The examiner presents each of 20 words, letter by letter, and the child is requested to mentally assemble them and report the resulting word. For both tasks, the scores refer to the total number of errors. Only age means (as raw scores) are provided.
    • Phonological awareness: phonemic elision [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
      Phonemic Elision assesses the ability to recognize and isolate the phonemic constituents of 20 words (in this specific case, the initial constituents). The child is asked to delete the first two phonemes in the word read by the examiner and to report the resulting pseudo-word.
    • Auditory attention [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
      Auditory selective attention was assessed using the Selective Auditory Attention Test from 'NEPSY-II'. In this task, the child listens to a pre-recorded list of words and touches the appropriate circle in the stimulus book when he or she hears a target word. This subtest has two parts. Auditory Attention is designed to assess selective auditory attention and the ability to sustain it (vigilance). Response Set is designed to assess the ability to shift and maintain a new and complex set involving both inhibition of previously learned responses and correctly responding to matching or contrasting stimuli. The child listens to a series of words and touches the appropriate circle when he or she hears a target word. Points are awarded only if the child responds correctly within 2 seconds of the target word presentation. Standard Scores are provided for the sum of Auditory Attention and Response Set.
    • Rhythm perception and reproduction [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
      Rhythm and sound length discrimination abilities were assessed using the Rhythm Task from the 'Q1 VATA Assessment Battery for Cross-domain Learning Abilities' (Batteria per la valutazione delle abilità trasversali all'apprendimento, Q1 VATA). Subtest 'Duration' proposes sequences of tones for which the child has to identify and indicate the tone differing from the others in duration (being shorter or longer than the other tones). There are 4-5 tones in a sequence. In the 'Rhythm' subtest, the child listens to sequences of 6 to 10 tones that can be either identical or different in the rhythmic pattern, and he has to decide whether the two sequences are the same or different. Rhythm reproduction ability was measured using the 'Rhythm reproduction task' test (Tre prove di ritmo), which consists of the request to reproduce a set of rhythmic patterns of increasing complexity. The child has to reproduce a sequence of beats (with the top of a pencil) as demonstrated by the examiner.


    Original Secondary Outcome: Same as current

    Information By: Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

    Dates:
    Date Received: May 26, 2016
    Date Started: January 2016
    Date Completion: June 2017
    Last Updated: April 11, 2017
    Last Verified: April 2017