Clinical Trial: The Efficacy of Prednisone and Azithromycin in the Treatment of Patients With Cat Scratch Disease
Study Status: Not yet recruiting
Recruit Status: Unknown status
Study Type: Interventional
Official Title: Open Label Study of Prednisone and Azithromycin in the Treatment of Patients With Cat Scratch Disease
Brief Summary:
Bartonella henselae is the etiologic agent of cat scratch disease (CSD). 90% of patients present with regional lymphadenitis (typical CSD) while 10% will have disease involving other organs, such as neuroretinitis, arthropathy, erythema nodosum, and encephalitis (atypical CSD). In most CSD cases resolution occurs in 2 to 3 months although a prolonged course often occurs. Data on the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in CSD is limited. Azithromycin has been shown to have a small favorable effect in a small comparative study and is commonly prescribed for CSD, however its overall effect is not satisfactory. Corticosteroids may be effective in the treatment of CSD for the following reasons:
- Many experts believe that host response is involved in the pathogenesis of CSD and is responsible for the clinical manifestations rather than the direct effect of B. henselae. The absence of viable organisms in affected lymph nodes (in the presence of positive PCR for B. henselae DNA), and the fact that arthritis, arthralgia and erythema nodosum (that are often associated with autoimmune diseases) have been described in CSD, support this concept.
- Corticosteroids have been anecdotally reported to have been administered to patients with CSD, apparently with some success. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroids in addition to azithromycin in CSD. The study hypothesis is that corticosteroids will improve out come. Ten patients with typical CSD will be treated with a 5-day oral course of prednisone (1 mg/kg up to 60 mg/day) and azithromycin (500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg on days 2-5). Patients will be under followed up for 3 months. Major outcome measures will include duration of symptoms and signs, with particular emphasis on affected lymph node size and duration using a specific scoring system (lymp
Detailed Summary:
Sponsor: Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Current Primary Outcome: Severity score of lymphadenitis using a lymphadenitis Score (LS). [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in LS until 75% and 90% reduction in LS ]
LS will evaluate the severity of lymphadenitis, using the following clinical parameters: size of lymph node in cm; pain estimated by the patient, using a 0-5 scale (0 equals no pain, 5 the most severe pain); tenderness estimated by the physician, (0 equals no tenderness, 5 the most severe tenderness); erythema of the skin overlying the affected lymph-node (0 no erythema, 1 mild erythema, 2 moderate erythema and 3 severe erythema); suppuration of a lymph node will score 5 points, no suppuration will score 0. The total score will consist of the arithmetical summation of the 5 parameters.
Original Primary Outcome: Severitiy score of lymphadenitis using a lymphadenitis Score (LS). [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in LS until 75% and 90% reduction in LS ]
LS will evaluate the severity of lymphadenitis, using the following clinical parameters: size of lymph node in cm; pain estimated by the patient, using a 0-5 scale (0 equals no pain, 5 the most severe pain); tenderness estimated by the physician, (0 equals no tenderness, 5 the most severe tenderness); erythema of the skin overlying the affected lymph-node (0 no erythema, 1 mild erythema, 2 moderate erythema and 3 severe erythema); suppuration of a lymph node will score 5 points, no suppuration will score 0. The total score will consist of the arithmetical summation of the 5 parameters.
Current Secondary Outcome:
Original Secondary Outcome:
Information By: Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Dates:
Date Received: September 13, 2011
Date Started: December 2011
Date Completion:
Last Updated: November 10, 2011
Last Verified: November 2011
