Clinical Trial: Prospective Comparative Study to Compare Safety and Effectiveness of Two Vertebral Compression Fracture Reduction Techniques
Study Status: Active, not recruiting
Recruit Status: Active, not recruiting
Study Type: Interventional
Official Title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Study to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Two Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) Reduction Techniques: the SpineJack® and the
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the SpineJack® with the Kyphx Xpander® Inflatable Bone Tamp and support a non-inferiority finding for the use of SpineJack® VCF treatment system versus Balloon Kyphoplasty.
Detailed Summary:
Sponsor: Vexim SA
Current Primary Outcome: Proportion of Participants With Study Success [ Time Frame: 12 month post-op ]
The primary composite endpoint defines a successful subject if the following components are satisfied (safety and effectiveness):
- Reduction in VCF fracture-related pain at 12 months from baseline as measured by a 100 mm VAS scale (reduction of pain at 12 months by > 20 mm) AND,
- Maintenance or improvement in function at 12 months from baseline as measured by the 100 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) AND,
- Absence of device-related serious adverse events, defined as device-related adverse events (device migration, recollapse, protrusion) or symptomatic cement extravasation requiring surgical re-intervention or retreatment at the index level, including revision, removal, reoperation, and/or supplemental fixation.
Original Primary Outcome: Same as current
Current Secondary Outcome:
Original Secondary Outcome:
Information By: Vexim SA
Dates:
Date Received: May 27, 2015
Date Started: April 2015
Date Completion: March 2018
Last Updated: February 17, 2017
Last Verified: February 2017