Clinical Trial: Efficacy of Two Ways of Applying Homework Assignments in the Treatment of Adjustment Disorders

Study Status: Completed
Recruit Status: Completed
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: Differential Efficacy of Two Ways of Applying Homework Assignments in the Treatment of Adjustment Disorders: Application Supported by Information and Communication Technol

Brief Summary:

The purpose of this study is to determine the differential efficacy of two ways of applying homework assignments in the treatment of Adjustment Disorders: 1) using an Internet-based emotional regulation therapy system (TEO) and 2) in the traditional way (using reading and audio materials).

The principal hypothesis is that both treatment conditions (TEO and Traditional) will show a similar efficacy. All participants will improve significantly on all outcome measures, regardless the type of homework assigned (TEO or Traditional) with no differences between them.


Detailed Summary: Adjustment Disorders (AD) are very prevalent in primary care and hospital settings. The available data indicate that the percentage of adults suffering from AD in primary care ranges from 5% to 21%. Furthermore, AD is an important public mental health problem in economic terms. Very frequently the distress and activity deterioration associated to this problem result in a decrease of work performance, causing a high percentage of sick leaves. However, nowadays there are no evidence-based psychological treatments for this problem, and only general treatment guidelines are available for this problem. For these reason, a Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment (CBT) supported by Virtual Reality (VR; EMMA system) was developed and has already shown its utility to treat this disorder. Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are useful tools for offer and improve therapeutic services. VR offers a safe and flexible environment in where the person can explore and manage their problems in a controlled and gradual way. Computerized programs allow reducing the contact time between therapist and patient, so it can reach patients who would not receive treatment otherwise. ICTs have been mainly used within the therapeutic context; specifically many studies have been centered on how to use the technologies to deliver the treatment. As far as the investigators know, no study analyzes the ICTs contribution in the homework assignments field. CBT approach provides a crucial role to homework assignments because it allows reinforcing and supporting the patients along the therapy. More studies examining the utility of the application of ICTs for the treatment of AD are needed. Furthermore, the application of the homework assignments component through the Internet is also relevant. It is necessary an adaptive and flexible system that allows adjusting the therapeutic homework on every patient's characteristics and needs, attending to the specific meaning of his/her problem. This would be a
Sponsor: Universitat Jaume I

Current Primary Outcome:

  • Change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996) [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    BDI-II is one of the most widely used questionnaires to evaluate the severity of depression in pharmacological and psychotherapy trials. It consists of 21 items about the different symptoms characterizing the major depression disorder, summed to obtain the total score, which can be a maximum of 63 points. The instrument has good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.76 to 0.95) and a test-retest reliability of around 0.8.
  • Change in Self-efficacy before and after homework assignment (Labpsitec 2010) [ Time Frame: 2 months ]
    The participant assesses perceived self-efficacy to cope with her problem before and after practicing the homework assigned in both conditions (TEO and Traditional) in a scale from 1= "Nothing at all" to 7= "Totally".
  • Change in Inventory of Stress and Loss (Mor, Molés, Rachyla and Quero, 2015) [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    It is an adaptation of the Complicated Grief Inventory (CGI; Prigerson, 1995). It includes 17 items that assess to which extent the lost person/situation interferes in the individual's life on a scale ranging from 0 ("Never") to 4 ("Always"). The instrument has excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.86) and a test-retest reliability of around 0.9.


Original Primary Outcome: Same as current

Current Secondary Outcome:

  • Change in Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) (Tedeschi y Calhoun, 1996) [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    - It is an instrument that assesses positive outcomes reported by people who have experienced a traumatic event. For each of the statements, participants indicate the degree to which this change occurred in their life as a result of their crisis, using the scale ranging from "I did not experience this change as a result of my crisis" (scored 0), to ''I experienced this change to a very great degree as a result of my crisis" (scored 5). The instrument has an excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0,90) and acceptable test-retest reliability of around 0.71.
  • Change in Avoidance, Emotional Distress and Belief Scales (Adapted from Marks and Mathews 1979). [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    This instrument establishes the main situations and behaviors evoking distress, the intrusive thoughts or images, the predominant negative emotions, and the irrational thoughts related to the stressor event. The patient assesses using 0-10 scales (0= "Nothing at all"; 10= "Totally") the degree of avoidance and distress related to the situations/behaviors, thoughts/images, and emotions, as well as the degree of belief in the irrational thoughts
  • Change in Mood State before and after homework assignments (Labpsitec 2010) [ Time Frame: 2 months ]
    The participant assesses mood state before and after practicing the homework assigned in both conditions (TEO and Traditional) on a 7-point Likert scale using faces reflecting different mood states.


Original Secondary Outcome: Same as current

Information By: Universitat Jaume I

Dates:
Date Received: May 20, 2015
Date Started: January 2013
Date Completion:
Last Updated: May 23, 2017
Last Verified: May 2017